Hcode
Prompt Engineering

Prompt Evaluation and Optimization

2-4 hours 4 Modules

Overview

Main Topic: Prompt Evaluation

Duration: 2 - 4 Hours

Level: Advanced

Target Audience: Quality Managers (QA), Developers, Technical Leaders, and AI Auditors

ABOUT THE TRAINING

How to know if your prompt is really effective or if it just "looks" good? This training teaches how to measure the quality of results objectively, eliminating empiricism and assumptions. The focus is on implementing a continuous improvement cycle through performance metrics, cost control (tokens), and response speed, ensuring a constant standard of excellence.

Objective

Empower professionals to act as a "Prompt Quality Manager", using structured testing methodologies and auditing to reduce rework and ensure maximum accuracy in AI deliverables.

TRAINING MODULES

Module 01

A/B Testing Methodology

Development of experiences to compare different versions of a prompt (e.g.: a more detailed version vs. a more direct one). Learning how to measure which variant delivers the best return and greatest accuracy for the specific use case.

Module 02

Self-Consistency

Implementation of the multiple reasoning pathways technique. Professionals learn to configure AI to generate various outputs for the same problem and select the most frequent and coherent response, drastically increasing reliability in complex tasks.

Module 03

Quality Metrics and Hallucination Score

Implementation of quantitative evaluation scales and criteria for clarity, utility, and veracity. Techniques to use the AI itself as an impartial auditor, assigning scores and grounded technical justifications to the generated responses.

Module 04

Audit and Continuous Optimization Lab

Practical exercise in logical refinement: analysis of interaction logs to identify pattern failures. The challenge is to optimize an unstable prompt until reaching a confidence index above 95%, focusing on reducing token consumption and eliminating ambiguities without the need for third-party tools.

Additional materials

Prompt sent:

"Act as a quality auditor. Rate the AI answer below on a scale of 1 to 5 for the criterion 'Clarity', where 1 is confusing and 5 is perfectly understandable. Justify your score."

In this training we also cover the Self-Consistency technique — ways of making the AI check its own work and fix mistakes before showing you the result.

Get in touch with our specialists

The names GPT-5 (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic), and Gemini (Google) are mentioned only for informational and comparative purposes.